lifewithryan.com master of none
A \"Holistic Hatred\" Ryan on May 24, 2005 2:29pm
In the short amount of time that I\'ve spent in the working world, I\'ve managed to experience several different \"cultures\" amongst companies. I\'ve worked the larger company with the \"small company\" feel, (though the dress code said, \"We\'re huge!\"). I\'ve also seen that same company get bought out by a much larger company, that had the real \"corporate feel\" to it. (Ironically their dress code was much more casual).

I\'ve worked for \"white collar\" union shops, and I\'ve worked for and am currently working for a small company. Out of ALL of these, I like the small company best, and if couldn\'t have that, I\'d take the large company with the small company feel before anything else. My least favorite was the union shop, but that\'s another subject entirely.

But this isn\'t about dress-code, or even the size of a company, this is about an image/feeling put forth in the way one describes their company.

About this time last year the president of our company uttered the phrase \"holistic approach\" during a meeting about our company\'s vision. Immediately my gut sank and for a moment I didn\'t understand why.

The dictionary describes holistic as:
  1. Of or relating to holism.
  2. Emphasizing the importance of the whole and the interdependence of its parts.
  3. Concerned with wholes rather than analysis or separation into parts: holistic medicine; holistic ecology.


That tells me nothing and makes it sound like you think you are \"greater than thou\" without telling me how or why. It sounds as if one that is not great is attempting to \"sound great\" and failing miserably to do so. It\'s an empty \"buzz-word\" and nothing more. What DOES it MEAN if your company is holistic or has a holistic approach? How did you get that way? Why is that different from anyone else? If that isn\'t immediately and evidently clear, then it isn\'t a very good description is it?

Today I heard that word again during a team meeting that was behing held to help us describe what we do and how we do it. I literally shivered when I heard it. Our team is many things, but one thing I HOPE we are not are users of fad-terms and buzz words.

There are companies out there that can get away with this sort of vernacular. But those companies are red-tape-ridden, overly \"corporate\", people-are-numbers, type companies, not the family-feel type company for which I work.

Even so, I still can\'t quite put my finger on what really bothers me about the use of words \"holistic\" and perhaps it boils down to the fact that I like to keep things simple. When someone uses a term, I shouldn\'t have to theorize about what it \"could\" mean. If you handle all aspects of a given trade, etc don\'t go trying to make it sound like its more than it is. Be direct, don\'t be vague or leave room for ambiguity. Speak your piece and get on with it, and don\'t clutter my brain with buzzwords and theory. Let your actions speak for themselves instead of trying to be clever with whatever sludge you may be throwing to make sale.

I don\'t say this to cut-down my team members because thankfully, at least on some level, I think they agree with me. I don\'t believe that, in the end, you\'ll find that word on our marketing site and I am confident we can take a \"holistic approach\" to find a better way to make our point...
comments:
Sully on 2005-05-24 21:22:37
As an English I feel I must reply to this. As someone who dabbles in holistic healing I feel I must reply to this. As someone who works for THE \"white collar\" union shop I feel I must reply. As someone who prefers the \"holistic approach\" to things I feel I must reply. All that stated, it is simply looking at the whole rather the parts. With regards to healing, think mind, body, soul. When I was an editor of a newspaper ten years ago we took a holistic approach to the paper. We didn\'t just change the look, but also the feel, the content, the style, the image and probably a dozen other thigns I forgot. Too often we break things down to their components and lose sight, not of the big picture, but of the whole picture...or your case the whole company. Don\'t fear the holistic approach and don\'t fear the reaper...seasons don\'t fear the reaper, nor do the wind, the sun or the rain.

Ryan on 2005-05-24 21:55:21
So when someone asked you, \"what is your school paper\'s vision?\" you literally told them that you take a holistic approach in putting together a paper?



However, you bring some very much needed clarity...but to me still sounds like a buzzword...:)

Ryan on 2005-05-25 08:41:36
I guess maybe I should clarify that I understand the definition of \"holistic\", but it just doesn\'t provide a useful description for me in this context.
What *IS* it about a \"holisitc\" approach that is significant?
Sully brings up a very good point in that alot of times we focuse too much on the components of a given \"thing\", (it\'s a technical term...thing), and lose sight of what that thing really is and should/can become.
But to me saying something like that doesn\'t tell me really why I should pick on company over another. I still think its fluff, but it helps to see other points of view on its usage. It reeks like the term \"synergy.\"

Sully on 2005-05-25 20:32:21
Nope, when we were discussing things that would the make paper better, more popular. Someone suggested better sports coverage, someone else suggested more articles. Someone then suggested we take a holistic approach (my first time hearing it in that context). We then started discussing the paper as a whole. \"Let\'s make it loud\", \"Let\'s make it funny\", etc. It does have a synergistic feel but it is a little different, especially when placed into different contexts. Synergy is another good word though. I use it often(and did use it an article) when discussing Bo Ryan\'s success as a coach at Platteville while I was there. His teams were far greater then the cummulative talent off his players. He understood how the players coule make each other better players and in turn the fed throughout the team and gave him three D3 titles in mine time there. It didn\'t matter whether he had 5 small guys or 5 big men, it was what the other players brought out of playing with each other that dictated who was on the court. Although not as apparent at the UW today, which I base on the good amount of talent he now has, I think it is still there. I do not think his success was do to a holistic approach to coaching a team, no do I think a holistic approach would be effective in this case.

When looking at a company\'s approach I would like the holistic approach more because I think it shows a focus on vision for the company versus focus on a component/product/service of the company...\"We want to be a Fortune 500 company\" vs. \"We want to be a Networking company\"...I think a holistic approach allows a company to evolve much easier than other approach (focus on a product/service). Maybe that gives a better idea of the difference between that and synergy, although they certainly can been very similar in their usage.

Allright, off to get this CVS setup!


Sully on 2005-05-25 20:35:02
I want to be able to edit my comments!!!

Ryan on 2005-05-26 09:32:34
Edit your comments?!? Heh, man I haven\'t even built the ability to comment on pictures even and you want to edit your comments...that\'s funny :)

I was thinking about that, but then it would require one to login...this blog is boring enough without people having to go through a login process just to read my meaningless drivel...

Maybe a preview before post...that I could do....


All Fields Req'd (I won't display your email)

Bold: [b]your bold text[/b]
Italics: [i]your italic text[/i]
Underline: [u]your underlined text[/u]
Link: [link]http://wherever[/link]

Barack Obama in '08

copyright 2008 -- All Rights Reserved